ifeelmyself.com forums

Just do a forum search, you will find heaps of contributor suggestions, videos, and even a gajillion discussions ruminating whether or not it's cool to call women 'squirters'. Enjoy!

Hey Justice2K and Annieboss! There is tons of great stuff here, but you're right you do have to do a bit of digging. There are worse things to do with your time than read though tons of great threads about...cumming. Right? Right.

Conviniently, for you, from time to time I cum when masturbate. You can find me under Jane_E. Actualize 1 and Intertext 2 may, maaaay, have what you are looking for -- assuming of course that a smart, cute, girl with a dog is at least part of what you're after.

This is also a great thread on female ejaculation in general: http://forum.ifeelmyself.com/forum/view … p?id=11061

And this one has all kinds of contributors and videos listed, along with the usual hilarious/insightful IFM staff/contributor/subscriber banter:
http://forum.ifeelmyself.com/forum/view … 621#p10662

Happy searching!

Last edited by jane_e (08-03-13 08:52:07)

Annieboss wrote:

Jane_E -- I like your style, your body, the banners, all smart and cute, though I wouldn't have picked that c word for you.

I agree that I'm not exactly person that comes to mind when you think cute, still, there is an element of cuteness there. Perhaps it's buried under my otherwise serious, quiet, early to bed, engineery exterior :)

Annieboss wrote:

I think there is something factual, not conjectural, about women shooting liquid out of their vaginas. More on this later.

I am interested to hear what you have been thinking about. Recently, I've felt less excited about it then I used to. I think I thought it was a phase that I was outgrowing, that I had some measure of control over it, that having sex regularly made it go away. It turns out that none of those things are true. Who knew?

Viva - I would be interested in knowing more about your last point regarding not tagging contributions, aside from the extra time involved and guessing how to label the features of each pleasuring beyond the ones you already use (solo, friends, studio, etc.).

I agree, Viva. I think that was what I was talking about earlier, about women who came to present themselves voluntarily on this site, at their own pace and style without much interference. Thats one of the main reasons why I stuck with IFM cause the concept of women's free will applies here.

But I think you've said it better :)

Tumblr is really great for consumers, but not so awesome for contributors. I'm happy about the 10x2 gif table of me masturbating which got like thousands of shares, which makes me feel hot and happy - but only because IFM paid me for that video first, honored (and continues to honor via royalties) my work financially and by setting up an integrity-based platform where I can feel valued and safe.

While a certain couple of staff members here make a massive effort to prevent copyright violation, ultimately this is the internet and it is impossible to entirely stem the flow of that trickle download effect. However I truly hope that people with the means and interest in supporting quality pornography and the amazing people who make it will do just that, give us and the other quality producers of porn money, real money so we can keep doing what we do, while you guys garden and build houses and set up mutual funds and make television and all the other things during the day, enjoying the fruits of our labor at night.. ;)

Don't get me wrong, I think tumblr is awesome. But yes it's good to be aware that almost no one makes original artwork for tumblr except for gifs which are created themselves from found content. Which doesn't make them less creative IMO.

The whole idea of the site is to share visual treats that folks find for themselves on the web, whether via forum-type community sites like reddit or from various blogs about art and food and photography. Some folks use tumblr as their primary blog for their personal photography and other visual art, for sure, but the majority of tumblr is the finding and sharing of other folks' work. Professional photographers, artists, and magazines are using this kind of social networking for promotion - in fact, ishotmyselfdotcom.tumblr.com is ISM's platform where we share pics from the website (as well as reblogging appropriately themed pics and quotes) to encourage people to join our community whether as members, contributors, or just interactive sharers in our philosophy of erotica.

So yeah it can be a valuable tool for promotion, and definitely people's individual mood boards can be cool places - collections are creative endeavors. just hopefully those photographers, amateur food critics, and artists are getting the financial support they need as well to keep contributing to that broader community.

As far as IFM, we're strict about copyright protection for a few reasons. The primary one is the protection of our contributors - as much as possible we would love their content not to be shared for free, as they benefit from both privacy and the money they earn through feckshare, our royalty system, when their vids are accessed through our site. And also we are strict about it because we work hard and spend a lot of money to make our nice videos. They are worth paying for.

Sorry for the rambles! I got a lots to say doncha know.

If you have some favorite tumblrs, don't hesitate to share them with us. I like pretty things.

I don't have any idea how normative my experience is, and it may well be that the flow of subscribers like me is outweighed by the people who say "eh, I can just get it for free," but I always feel like I should, when the discussion about something I came to be a paying customer of via piracy turns anti-pirate, point out that it is a mixed bag.

Every time we clean up pirated content, our memberships drop.  So yes you're right, it drives new members here, but there are other considerations - the most important being, as Viva points out, the contributors, who agreed to get involved in a 'members only' environment.  There are some exceptions, contributors who are cool for us to post their stuff everywhere (and usually paid more for it), so you might see some sanctioned stuff occasionally, such as Liandra Dahl's 'Indulgence'.

richard wrote:

I don't have any idea how normative my experience is, and it may well be that the flow of subscribers like me is outweighed by the people who say "eh, I can just get it for free," but I always feel like I should, when the discussion about something I came to be a paying customer of via piracy turns anti-pirate, point out that it is a mixed bag.

Every time we clean up pirated content, our memberships drop.  So yes you're right, it drives new members here, but there are other considerations - the most important being, as Viva points out, the contributors, who agreed to get involved in a 'members only' environment.  There are some exceptions, contributors who are cool for us to post their stuff everywhere (and usually paid more for it), so you might see some sanctioned stuff occasionally, such as Liandra Dahl's 'Indulgence'.

Absolutely. Although the stuff I initially found was terribly hot, it wasn't obvious until I joined the site and had a look around how much the focus was on allowing contributors to control the conditions of their labor and to frame their own portrayals. Which makes absolute sense - part of authentically capturing female sexuality is letting the women whose sexuality is being captured control the terms. And distribution is a part of that.

I just always shift uncomfortably when discussions of anti-piracy views come up. :)